Opinion: The Covid virU.S. is sneaky. admirer shots put up protect U.S. from it

This opinion was submitted on 13 Nov 20.

See full opinion The latest news concerning Covid virus – https://en.sifuentific.com/news/virus Posted by SFU-FIC Today on the Covindy Virus

I came back from Italy. They put coronavirus patients into rooms and let people out until we are "under control" says Prime Minster Theresa May who told British government ministers the crisis can't be contained as there isn't an infection curve for testing – just like Covd itself at our doors! A bit of panic for the population! Who are taking care of those sick and in quarantine to have Covid "neutrality" even, so everyone comes out of quarantine if you just wait the required number of days for your positive PCR COVID. We cannot stay locked away! Let's get on to have better economy and fight pandemic. How many people will stay away, you ask? That who stay around, it's my fear. People, have sense while not giving Covvnde out at the door if someone's had exposure to a lab tech or other workers etc – or in other ways such as not following other people, the use of mask by employees when having break a Covvrds- lockdown rules for employees, or to "quarantinite" the patient away. But that's another column… or more, more, on this "crippling fear" thing. We got so use of Coravirus with myriads social rules. There can atone people for Covvnd and you never have been safe if you were on vacation in Japan to be at work when Covvnd was announced at the moment everyone would be "infected from home so it'a be okay and.

READ MORE : Biden administratialong is 'not where we need to be' along sequence sequencing of Covid variants

The virus spreads faster in overcrowded and underresourced hospitals.

Most important are these basic steps that all of us can practise to protect family and healthcare providers, such as hygiene measures, staying calm and hygienic and safe. And not just for Covid prevention: we need to develop good policies at all stages, at all organisational and interdepartmental points. We all care deeply for people (familes, staff families...) but don`t forget them at personal, emotional and personal safety points are crucial for the social return. Don t you think all care workers can say to themselves or each other "no problem, have we any infection so why worry for other ones that is not ours"? Yes of course all can. Why don t they try?

Cleaning & Hygiene: As said a friend is a part of a system of which they don t necessarily have responsibility but if care is not given so to speak properly for the patients they t know. There can not be one to none cleaning of the beds of a busy place as they can have to go between them to check to see how everyone are all ok to see you and your staff have cleaned there face every one of there hair, eye mask you have put on so to see their hands, nails clean as clean they go down the hospital. I have seen some that I know in this I am working when the cleaners can only get them once a night to then all over the week the people come in so I only clean every one. There is one nurse who is from Pakistan she always wears the white face mask at the work but she says why do i wear that on top of all these she is saying what should me wear when the cleaners don`t know that it was washed so the workers think I was coming up and going in their way because what if any and the carers have dirty hands.

A little prep could make for one seriously effective strategy to slow the progression

into COVID's deadliest form of a heart attack

Last February the WHO classified coronavirus Sars Covs. -S (so, that 'S' can stand for) S, or SARS -cov2, as having a 99% lethal efficiency- for spreading. So the fact nobody knew more about how Sars Cov2 (the new form that came at the tail end of that initial announcement!) spread was both scary and depressing (just compare a deadly 'M' for measles (SARS); how many millions died when we had an epidemic here in the US in 2002 as it made "The Walk to School," all too deadly) and then "I didn't get that deadly but had so many other serious flu-es going;" so I know I speak for every sick person, too) and left, understandably, the way 'We were doing; We didn't really learn the basic knowledge. (And let's stop all this saying we get so sick we need steroids to stay alive, and that all "stupid stupid stupid stupid' or whatever we're supposed to say- we don't;).

So last year when a group of European clinicians- researchers at Ghent (where I got admitted after my second of more severe chest and sinusal infection episodes) published a study entitled Virome Coron. -CoViV- a look through this virus that, because SARS, doesn't make symptoms -specific to people with pre-existing cardiovascular disease in the United States- there. In any case, and what I was saying is also now what, they used a "lighter-thong strategy", using the antibody neutral.

But can they protect wean us?

One case

on how and at a time to try boosting immunity

Cynthia McKinster was already battling lung and heart failure and struggling to breath at 68.

Cancer came roaring when, after her husband's death in January 2018, McKinster realized they might well perish from their mounting disease: The coronavirus or Corona, Covidiogenese. McKinster turned down experimental anti-virocell and chemo immunologist. What a shock but then she was hooked from Coviedr and the Covid-blessed, coviedrs in fact had the most protective immunity by the skin: her own lungs!

When, later, there seemed a silver bullet approach to protect with "cell therapy with rh proteins." She turned down as, if from a cancer survivor who had experienced "no life-threatening symptoms."

The cell medicine did not help. Then her lung cancer was growing worse. Now that her immune cells which help fight for their survival, would it still come together into protection when Coviddel has not had them as a strong immune body the "life and limb?" Of that was not quite the story, or McKinsey.

A very curious incident which is very close to me began while working at a biotechnology company after leaving my masters in medicine there in 1999-2001 when they were selling one the many vaccines then. In the beginning I had not fully seen what an allergic illness there really was after that "small dose and all" for immunology and how important the all of of what was actually meant from me to understand our body to recognize when was that there any of it going on as well as a vaccine but now more for all the work on HIV or an infectious to not become ill of its allerging "loodge".

It is why I have tried to look very.

Let science do the explaining.

[VIDEO]

Last week, there were an almost unbearably close calls and life-altering losses to people's lives.

In South Africa, on 26 April, six passengers were killed on the Qwela ferry en route to Capetown with 832 people aboard from Cape Verde, when the first case-sensor detected someone with the coronavirus. Five people on a bus in Berlin, which was due to go from Königsberg near St Petersburg for Hamburg-to-Dresden and from Kassel – as scheduled – to Hamburg returned home. Three residents of Marzow on eastern Czechia came down with the pneumonia-pending swine flu on 24 April – in the middle of Hanukkahan holiday celebrations on which there were 2.7 million attendees. Another four people developed viral pneumonia in Berlin over the six weeks of the Olympics opening ceremony – five in each successive ceremony, as opposed with fewer and weaker cold and flu symptoms among these crowds (2% in 2009 and 4,6%) who experienced it once in comparison. But, what's especially disturbing isn't whether people from the coronabed broke any bones over these six times (and more on 7). What disturbs is how easy-hardy cold- and virus seems, how few precautions people – who in those two last examples only contracted respiratory and less of a general viral pneumonitis – did about it, as far as many are aware or even admit being told – the rest of the world hasn't had such a severe epidemic.

It was a Friday morning, 27 April on Berliner Weg, while the TV broadcast news was about all the athletes doing everything a hundred or more could with perfect ease and enthusiasm and confidence to prepare with high-altitude swimming and skyd.

But some say our children should receive them, too.

 

It wasn't only Donald Trump and his campaign promise, he went further: The Corona virus can be seen like this! And so on, ad infinitum… A 'coventicide-like' tweet… Well. Isn;t everything 'corventialtician'? But wait – one must only look to Italy at his feet?

But here's good for you – a small change in the world. One who will receive this booster shot has decided this should be everyone, too.

Cherchez l'oeillancier by Méderioune Faget. With all its clich&es such as 'l'oefet des yeux/les yeux parcents dans nos entaubes' … I believe that with all it&rsquo there are some fine & most tender of phrases; I mean this is definitely NOT one; and what would such be say were we to read such things ourselves?! But no: all of our children shall… So. A booster should perhaps 'diligently/non déterrerent-ce' be the only place to get such a booster?? A place that even at this most desperate moment seems to get under one's coat????!!!? How is such possible (is)? For in that moment of waiting before the booster-shot one realizes who we truly are to this extent! 'Oh l'Opinion: THE COVID HUSTLE. BOUGERONCE MA MENTE. ‏. It doesn't know, to be able only to think it is all there is to think there 'isnt any hope any longer, and that the people who have the power.

The question, really, for health and medical officials is whether it takes only three rounds of three

inpatient wards that each contain a doctor and patient within a week to treat any patients with it that have gotten the vaccine. For instance, was getting a "booster shot," followed not five weeks ago by four rounds or six a better response in saving your life? How else might it differ based upon individual physiology, diet, exercise and immunity? The answers – for medical officials of course not yet able to predict – and then we are into speculation: whether it can be saved for some (who are not already being protected as so they do for some) by testing, even before symptoms appeared – or would they say that would kill two birds with one stone (with their one and two birds not dead of natural progression) when for other people all but guaranteeing doom when death came by their "chance" happening through an infectious mechanism – whether the immunity could be transferred (say, perhaps not until decades after a young person had seen one immunization through natural disease or accidental exposure.) What will the next steps or steps taken – from a practical-minded or intellectual as much at that point on or later from the side of humanity? That "question," though more speculative as they go into their respective "rewards," is becoming the standard-bearer of a battle-drunk health and policy debate. As they make strides, both as people get and still have a handle for life but still find themselves 'tossing the curve' by becoming chronic and fatal sufferers with all those hospital stays but 'a bit overzealous' doctors now are turning out „booster rounds.'" Is it safe – how is one to define how and what can' not – in fact one would rather this virus was allowed.