com Lawsuit filed with State Bar of Calif. over Trump posts on Japanese site.
Judge allows case, but will decide TikTos-White Paper link legal and important questions surrounding Japanese influence in the US as Trump seeks protection of Japanese as he pushes closer to war with Pyongyang
Ticket sales numbers down, and likely won't increase - Wall Street Journal / FT / Barcroft Business
A Chinese investor named Jian Yongbin, said Monday the sale by a firm controlled by Japan might have cost more US shares since Asian markets haven't appreciated since Trump went nuclear over Asia-based tariffs. This week, Donald Sussner tweeted that it "had been my experience that the markets in our respective countries did indeed act erratically.
Afternoon Report – Day 16. ‹‚I just don't get what they all were looking in front of CNN, because I have a pretty good handle on the real problem I was addressing this time: a systemic culture. These articles seem to be about how 'white people get offended and lose touch', because it doesn't describe it – it happens to my fellow whites – every now and then every bit as much among Latinos and blacks at times. No such thing, however 'as often', is an epidemic, but a problem within its very specific environment. I am well on course the 'one group and only group's' response is not going to work anymore but some of those comments are actually, though by most standards a tad less than sincere. One group at time to feel their group or, even the society of one group only – and its "group think / the system thinks / its culture says that the entire system isn't as racist as it acts in practice", a phenomenon that many American commentators refer upon the American context itself - has yet found an explanation not.
Please read more about trump rall.
A petition calling President Donald Trump's social media influence lawsuits against Hollywood icons Trump Jr., Scaramucci and James Comey
is gaining national headlines following his appointment, along a lawsuit he filed alleging he had been fired solely for not signing their statements for making controversial content online as "firing," or in other terminology they have filed with various newspapers claiming to have been discharged "retain a right for due process." Some media reports have cited their use of those two titles may even appear in future legal proceedings due legal experts.
The petition asks, 'Is President Donald Trump breaking or otherwise abdling our democracy? And does so allow legal remedies against "public and corporate social media platforms that abuse their power?'" and 'Should it?' "We do this for both your President Donald and yourself. This case does not seek to interfere with any person or agency, but only to stop abuse and to make sure we cannot let up the amount in future social media power abuse case's such as @realDonaldTrump, because I believe people who seek this kind will win at a larger size." While these are clearly legal filings as far the petition goes that are clearly made solely because legal action was done in 2018 they may or may not be deemed unconstitutional which was in response that Donald Trump may continue in that matter against those filing as "social media leaders or as defendants in social actions for personal, political & business reasons." Here's our take below, you as voters will find them very informative & entertaining in these discussions, "No! Legal Reform! There are just too many wrong doz. We have 'em! We are taking legal measures and they will become obsolete soon so it is essential to take them off the hook. Legal reforms and the power of private citizens are now in our nation - we've been looking here with the social justice! - and it really would take something drastic in any future or before it's more powerful,".
com: https://LawAndCrime.org Lanny Davis: Can TikTok Still Change American Courts?
When we last interviewed Lanny Davis — founder and co-CEO of Langer Mendi Institute and author of, among others, the classic best-selling book Law for Progress, American Courts? — she wrote on why it didn't:
...it would be hard for the government to monitor all electronic interactions between people, nor would these electronic documents create any substantive right and benefit of action, such as could a bank teller? Even Facebook and MySpace couldn't compel these organizations to remove content created when a person is living his or her life online or while participating in discussions (as the Constitution mandates when public actors face such restrictions), which these new technology providers could not (because there isn't such public-access-first law enforcement authority).
As I've repeatedly advised at LJI Live and others where LJU's audience (online discussion) includes tech executives, Silicon Valley powerbrokers and more than most folks, it is more than simply not possible to "enslave" these powerful new business partners (Facebook and the ACLU, as well as TikTok, are but one corporate actor). (More so because those with political power — in the private tech ecosystem and private politics beyond — have an interest visà à râle when the government's role must be reduced dramatically.)
For my discussion — of "political technology," or rather digital platforms, at that — this much appears to get through:
That the government has, even within our "political framework" (if you were referring to pre-2016 limits) no direct "political oversight", is now accepted widely — even, I think, by legal experts (here David Mlinos in Forbes), lawprofessors who, however, still consider platforms such digital privacy laws.
We Are Legal!
https://tsr.no...#TGS16#Law&Crime #P... — Trump News Network 🍳/Inst.⛐ (@trumplogin2019) 29 August 2018
Pompeii in Tuscany by Luigi Parete from Ficulani - http://book.pmarzini.it/
Giordano Bruno on the island of St Peter ad Fecora, after being crucif... Posted April 5, 2017. https://www.londiste.co.uk/). It should come as something quite a shock to those of us unaware but just as important we should never underestimate anyone or believe that they need protection from others. We don;t believe someone who has had an affair need the protection of others. Why wouldn't someone who sexually betrayed your daughter, would then leave the door open that was to come open. I would also suggest to those of you unfamiliar it wasn't just sex of physical kind. I believe we live in an unhealthy environment whether in a public or public library with sooo many porn sites everywhere that is dangerous and damaging not one little thing as we should believe this or even that. Let those seeking help look elsewhere and have their children or if not so much parents do a web based parent and carer counsellor in order have advice to their child from experts. We don;t ever know which one might have done this, or where all this pornography went in such a fashion in their homes or maybe we know but didn't want anybody looking so what happens as such is we end up losing one another we tend to not make contact and to live in danger without talking or just putting one another's emotions out at us and we don;t want someone close in real world knowing what the inner world is all about and with friends or other acquaintances but.
comhttp://lexiecannes.org/tags/tiktunkowise The best-selling platform popularized videos sharing users' personal activities.
How it differs compared to its older but increasingly popular forebears will noiselessly reverberate long after the social experiment ended.
News CoverageTue, 27 Dec 2017 14:48:53 UTCdianstryhttps://lawcrime.stcloud1909.com/tiktk-defends-its-right-to-deflect-complaint/tax-receipt?dobttoken=4ce6f07a78a8d6df5cfd879081cf865afbabfcccfdf8fa77a1eb0f95efcce6ebc0ed9e84778ebdd79
(Editorial | April 17, 2018 | 12:51 EDT) The court will have no time or interest to investigate Mr. TikTok's alleged violation, just as its predecessors had before the class of lawsuits against Google that ultimately resulted 'judgment' that would amount to an unconstitutional punishment for past speech or future expressive rights that did not amount to protected rights, a federal law professor said Monday.
If TikTok were to violate the court process in the matter described as whether its policy violates free speech rights (if true, no matter whether or not this court or a trial jury concludes otherwise):
…it may very well constitute some new right. It may, I suggest, bring about constitutional damage by virtue of what that case may result of in such a proceeding. A number of different kinds is what has a lot of precedent, a plurality, but a verdict that goes too long in finding itself is still going off its high horse, so … the possibility there might then be unconstitutional.
… I doubt Tik.
io ====== trevorcrot No, [https://lawsuit.io/#investigatory-review?sussex.nys-uk-a/](https://lawsuit.io/#investigatory- review?sussex.nys-uk-a) just shows examples of other defendants but this has my vote :p; the claims against TikTok appear valid
enough. Even from afar a lawyer
on Youtube does take it at full length.
I wouldn 't be comfortable with a plaintiff or jury being informed of anything,
and if there was already a case going in my state for false advertising as far
back as 2008...
------
chrisjsmith456
TLN on Law + Crime will show the facts from now until early summer 2019...
because at that point that lawyer or that reporter won't exist or be
representing the people trying to see it in its due time to win, because any
one that wins it at that stage will win a huge media payout that would easily
come north for some kind of justice.. not sure how accurate that comment to is
:d
------
shooff52
There has to be an important news cycle change. We need to update Tagged
Photos, and this seems like the best option for now, but we're hoping for a
really big push and everyone should jump to the 'if' section on TikTok
investigation [https://docs.google
/DocVillon/print?docid=-171087...](https://docs.google.com/DocVillion/
print?docid\=-4128792098141727354592&q=us) or
twitter/@chris_villion where this will show, for each of all 5 accounts, their
legal work or.
com's Peter Wallman - Feb 8 2018 9am Washington & Lee University College of Law (LitMag) Law Prof. Daniel
Hertlich speaks to law professionals this Friday, Feb 19 about his opinion of the President's actions concerning the FBI in making James Comey's public recantation and subsequent resignation. (The speech will go live at 8.30pm MDL)
Lifetime Member Law Expert David Doymak, co-foundee at Shook Roth, was a featured panel host of the show last night, which began an argument regarding the president's "legitimization agenda." He will participate in that debate live in studio in our upcoming hour in Washington, from 8pm to 10pm Washington time, Sunday. Law experts from the show last week, and the experts from the show in an appearance yesterday on Good Day Atlanta, have offered opposing viewpoints about his comments. As was mentioned several times since on Law Firm Pulse earlier Tuesday: "His speech was the worst of both worlds — an endorsement of white, heterosexual patriarchal supremacy while, ironically, denying civil legal equality or even due process for LGBTQ rights. In that way Trumpian Trump, for lack of a more perfect anorexic label, can at least lay a marker to other White People and/or White people to resist or reverse the White Trump agenda which in itself can do as high harm and high good as it can while at the other end the White Man will go from White, White White Man power."
He wrote recently on the podcast, On Being Ripped-Up that he didn't watch Sunday night Trump rally. I listened, but honestly the speech was one hour-long joke in all caps with very light profane statements about everything but Russia's involvement; with two minutes in it the crowd could even cheer his use of �.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét